↓ Skip to main content

Current practice in cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for metastatic peritoneal disease: Spanish multicentric survey

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Surgical Oncology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
43 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
6 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current practice in cytoreductive surgery and HIPEC for metastatic peritoneal disease: Spanish multicentric survey
Published in
European Journal of Surgical Oncology, December 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.11.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Morales-Soriano, Neus Esteve-Pérez, Juan José Segura-Sampedro, Pedro Cascales-Campos, Pedro Barrios, Spanish Group of Peritoneal Malignancy Surface, J. Alonso-Gómez, A. García-Fadrique, A. Arjona-Sánchez, X. Arteaga-Martín, P. Bretcha-Boix, B. Camps-Vilata, V. Concepción- Martin, D. García-Olmo, J. Gil-Martínez, A. Gómez Portilla, L. González-Bayón, S. González-Moreno, A. Gutiérrez-Calvo, F. Martínez-Regueira, A. Mayol-Oltra, C. Muñoz-Casares, D. Padilla-Valverde, D. Pacheco-Sánchez, P.A. Parra-Baños, F. Pereira-Pérez, J. Pérez-Celada, C. Ramírez-Plaza, I. Ramos-Bernadó, J. Torres-Meleroad, J. Vaqué-Urbaneja

Abstract

Radical Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC), has been proposed as the current standard of treatment for metastatic peritoneal disease by several tumors. Despite its widely utilization, there seems to be a great variability in their organization, clinical practice, and safety among centers. To obtain updated information on clinical practice in different perioperative areas of the CRS-HIPEC. All 25 members of the Spanish Surface Peritoneal Malignancy (GECOP), were invited to answer an online survey, to describe their usual practice in different perioperative areas of the CRS-HIPEC. Survey was responded by 100% of centers. This study represents more than 800 patients treated annually. Seventy per cent of respondents perform CRS-HIPEC for more than 5 years. The most frequent technique was Coliseum (88%). Routinely non-invasive monitoring of cardiac output is used by 92% of centers. More than 50% of centers administer oxaliplatin (74%), or mitomycin-C (65%) in colorectal cancer; cisplatin in gastric cancer (73%) and mesothelioma (74%). Ovarian cancer is treated with cisplatin and various combinations, in 64% or paclitaxel in 54.5%. Spillage protocol was available in 100% centers. Data showed an important variability in volume of patients per center, selection of cytostatic agents, professional training and safety measures applied. The standardization of CRS/HIPEC procedures based on the best available evidence, the individualization of patients and the consensus among professionals, constitute an important part of the basis that will allow us to improve results of this complex procedure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Other 6 8%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,278,688
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Surgical Oncology
#51
of 2,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,682
of 446,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Surgical Oncology
#1
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,691 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.