You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Personal exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields in Europe: Is there a generation gap?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environment International, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marloes Eeftens, Benjamin Struchen, Laura Ellen Birks, Elisabeth Cardis, Marisa Estarlich, Mariana F. Fernandez, Peter Gajšek, Mara Gallastegi, Anke Huss, Leeka Kheifets, Inger Kristine Meder, Jørn Olsen, Maties Torrent, Tomaž Trček, Blaž Valič, Roel Vermeulen, Martine Vrijheid, Luuk van Wel, Mònica Guxens, Martin Röösli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 44% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 100 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 34 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 11 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 6% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 26% |
| Unknown | 37 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,811,938
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Environment International
#1,285
of 5,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,931
of 347,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment International
#47
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.