You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fascitis necrotizante en miembro inferior derecho secundaria a colección presacra por dehiscencia de anastomosis colorrectal
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Gastroenterología y Hepatología (ScienceDirect), July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2020.04.011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alejandro Gil Catalán, Myriam Fernández Isart, Margarita Gamundí Cuesta, Francisco Xavier González Argenté |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 4 | 80% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,382,491
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Gastroenterología y Hepatología (ScienceDirect)
#72
of 644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,547
of 429,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Gastroenterología y Hepatología (ScienceDirect)
#4
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 644 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.