↓ Skip to main content

Predictors of outcome in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictors of outcome in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae
Published in
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.06.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Russo, M. Falcone, B. Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez, E. Calbo, B. Almirante, P.L. Viale, A. Oliver, P. Ruiz-Garbajosa, O. Gasch, M. Gozalo, J. Pitout, M. Akova, C. Peña, J.M. Cisneros, A. Hernández-Torres, A. Farcomeni, N. Prim, J. Origüen, G. Bou, E. Tacconelli, M. Tumbarello, A. Hamprecht, I. Karaiskos, C. de la Calle, F. Pérez, M.J. Schwaber, J. Bermejo, W. Lowman, P.-R. Hsueh, M. Mora-Rillo, J. Rodriguez-Gomez, M. Souli, R.A. Bonomo, D.L. Paterson, Y. Carmeli, A. Pascual, J. Rodríguez-Baño, M. Venditti, REIPI/ESGBIS/INCREMENT investigators

Abstract

Few data are reported in literature regarding severe sepsis or septic shock due to extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae (E). The aim of this study was to assess predictors of outcome in septic patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by ESBL-E. Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock and BSI due to ESBL-E were selected from the INCREMENT database. The primary endpoint of the study was the evaluation of predictors of outcome after 30 days from development of severe sepsis or septic shock due to ESBL-E infection. To perform analysis were created three cohorts: global, empirical-therapy and targeted-therapy cohorts. 367 septic patients were analyzed. Overall mortality was 43.9% at 30 days; Escherichia coli (62.4%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (27.2%) were the most frequent isolates. β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLBLI) combinations was the most empirically used drug (43.6%), followed by carbapenems (29.4%); empirical therapy resulted active in vitro in 249 (67.8%) patients, but an escalation of antibiotic therapy was reported in 287 (78.2%) patients. Cox regression analysis showed that age, Charlson Comorbidity Index, McCabe classification, Pitt bacteremia score, abdominal source of infection and escalation of antibiotic therapy were independently associated with 30-day mortality. No differences were reported about survival in patients treated with BLBLI combinations or carbapenems in empirical or definitive therapy. BSI due to ESBL-E in patients who developed severe sepsis or septic shock was associated with high 30-day mortality; comorbidities, severity scores, source of infection and need of antibiotic therapy escalation were important determinants of unfavorable outcome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 65 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 14%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 9%
Librarian 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Other 15 23%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 34%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 13 20%
Unknown 16 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2020.
All research outputs
#6,376,627
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
#850
of 3,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,275
of 342,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
#14
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.