You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determinants and Differences in Satisfaction with the Inhaler Among Patients with Asthma or COPD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.09.020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vicente Plaza, Jordi Giner, Elena Curto, M. Belén Alonso-Ortiz, Miren Itxaso Orue, José María Vega, Borja G. Cosío, study, Virginia Bellido Linares, Roberto Bernabeu Mora, Eva Cabrera Cesar, Ariel Callero Viera, Rafael Castillo, Julio Delgado Romero, Ma José Espinosa de los Monteros-Garde, José María Fernández Rodríguez-Lacín, José Carlos García Robaina, Aníbal Manuel Hernández Gil, José Miguel Hernández Rey, Guacimara Hernández Santana, Cristina López Ruiz, Enrique Mascaros Balaguer, Francisco Javier Mazo Echaniz, Núria Moreno Pérez, Antonio Parra Arrondo, José Portillo Sánchez, José Ramón Rodríguez Encinar, Elena Rodríguez Plata, Berta Román Bernal, Anna Sala Cunill, Fernando J. Sánchez Lora, Juan Miguel Sánchez Nieto, Joan Serra Batlles, José Joaquín Torres Relucio, Agustín Valido Morales, Rubén Luciano Vázquez Alarcón, José Luis Velasco Garrido |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 25% |
| Argentina | 1 | 8% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 22 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 23% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,513,845
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#1,931
of 4,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,980
of 364,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
#76
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,375 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.