↓ Skip to main content

Hyperlactatemia in ICU patients: Incidence, causes and associated mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Critical Care, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hyperlactatemia in ICU patients: Incidence, causes and associated mortality
Published in
Journal of Critical Care, July 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.07.039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mireia Ferreruela, Joan Maria Raurich, Ignacio Ayestarán, Juan Antonio Llompart-Pou

Abstract

To describe the incidence, causes and associated mortality of hyperlactatemia in critically ill patients and to evaluate the association between lactate clearance and in-hospital survival. Retrospective cohort study of patients with hyperlactatemia admitted to the ICU. Hyperlactatemia was defined as a blood lactate concentration ≥5mmol/L and high-grade hyperlactatemia a lactate level ≥10mmol/L. Lactate clearance was calculated as the percentage of decrease in lactate concentration from the peak value. Of 10,123 patients, 1373 (13.6%) had lactate concentration ≥5mmol/L, and 434(31.6%) of them had ≥10mmol/L. The most common causes of hyperlactatemia were sepsis/septic shock and post-cardiac surgery. An association was found between lactate concentration and in-hospital mortality (p<0.001). The area under the receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) of lactate concentration and the optimal cut off to predict mortality were 0.72 (0.70-0.75) and 8.6mmol/L, respectively. ROC analysis for lactate clearance to predict in-hospital survival showed that the best area under the curve was obtained at 12h: 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.59-0.75). Hyperlactatemia was common and associated with a high mortality in critically ill patients. Lactate clearance had limited utility for predicting in-hospital survival.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 12 18%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 49%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Engineering 3 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2018.
All research outputs
#3,698,342
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Critical Care
#519
of 2,468 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,834
of 326,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Critical Care
#17
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,468 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.