You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Negative predictive value of procalcitonin to rule out bacterial respiratory co-infection in critical covid-19 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Infection, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.06.024 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Raquel Carbonell, Silvia Urgelés, Melina Salgado, Alejandro Rodríguez, Luis Felipe Reyes, Yuli V. Fuentes, Cristian C. Serrano, Eder L. Caceres, María Bodí, Ignacio Martín-Loeches, Jordi Solé-Violán, Emili Díaz, Josep Gómez, Sandra Trefler, Montserrat Vallverdú, Josefa Murcia, Antonio Albaya, Ana Loza, Lorenzo Socias, Juan Carlos Ballesteros, Elisabeth Papiol, Lucía Viña, Susana Sancho, Mercedes Nieto, M del, Carmen Lorente, Oihane Badallo, Virginia Fraile, Fernando Arméstar, Angel Estella, Paula Abanses, Isabel Sancho, Neus Guasch, Gerard Moreno, COVID-19 SEMICYUC Working Group and the LIVEN-Covid-19 Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 7 | 70% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 41 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Librarian | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 25 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,005,078
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Infection
#573
of 2,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,336
of 441,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Infection
#22
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.