↓ Skip to main content

Valoración del riesgo de fractura en población general en España mediante el algoritmo FRAX®: Estudio EPISER2016

Overview of attention for article published in Medicina Clínica (ScienceDirect), November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Valoración del riesgo de fractura en población general en España mediante el algoritmo FRAX®: Estudio EPISER2016
Published in
Medicina Clínica (ScienceDirect), November 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.medcli.2019.05.042
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carmen Gómez-Vaquero, Dolores Fábregas-Canales, Daniel Seoane-Mato, Carlos Sánchez-Piedra, Federico Díaz-González, Sagrario Bustabad-Reyes, en nombre del Grupo de Trabajo del Proyecto EPISER2016, Grupo de Trabajo del Proyecto EPISER2016, Lucía Silva-Fernández, Francisca Sivera, Neus Quilis Martí, Francisco J. Blanco, Fernando Pérez Ruiz, Joana Atxotegi Sáenz de Buruaga, Irati Urionagüena Onaindia, Boris Anthony Blanco Cáceres, Antonio Juan-Mas, José M. Pego-Reigosa, Javier Narváez, Raúl Cortés Verdú, Fred Antón-Pagés, Víctor Quevedo Vila, Laura Garrido Courel, Natividad del Val del Amo, Inmaculada Paniagua Zudaire, Gustavo Añez Sturchio, Fermín Medina Varo, Myriam Gandía Martínez, Antonio Romero Pérez, Javier Ballina, Anahy Brandy García, Dolores Fábregas Canales, Teresa Font Gayá, Carolina Bordoy Ferrer, Beatriz González Álvarez, Laura Casas Hernández, Fátima Álvarez Reyes, Mónica Delgado Sánchez, Cristina Martínez Dubois, Simón Ángel Sánchez-Fernández, Luisa Marena Rojas Vargas, Paula Virginia García Morales, Alejandro Olivé, Paula Rubio Muñoz, Marta Larrosa, Noemí Navarro Ricos, Eduard Graell Martín, Eugenio Chamizo, Lara Chaves Chaparro, Sara Rojas Herrera, Jordi Pons Dolset, Miguel Ángel Polo Ostariz, Susana Ruiz-Alejos Garrido, Cristina Macía Villa, Ana Cruz Valenciano, María Luisa González Gómez, Mercedes Morcillo Valle, Deseada Palma Sánchez, María José Moreno Martínez, Marta Mayor González

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Unknown 8 73%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,263,348
of 25,481,734 outputs
Outputs from Medicina Clínica (ScienceDirect)
#225
of 2,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,820
of 476,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicina Clínica (ScienceDirect)
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,481,734 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,059 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.