↓ Skip to main content

Urinary tract infection’s etiopathogenic role in nephrolithiasis formation

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Hypotheses, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urinary tract infection’s etiopathogenic role in nephrolithiasis formation
Published in
Medical Hypotheses, June 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.mehy.2018.06.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

J.L. Bauza, E.C. Pieras, F. Grases, V. Tubau, J. Guimerà, X.A. Sabaté, P. Pizà

Abstract

Urolithiasis has a high prevalence and recurrence rate, especially in developed countries, and is a major public health issue with a high socioeconomic cost. There are multiple causes of urolithiasis, including urinary tract infection (UTI). Infection stones (mainly composed of struvite) are associated with renal infections by urease-producing bacteria. However, there is limited knowledge about the role of UTIs in the formation of stones that are apparently not related with infection. We hypothesize that UTIs promote the formation of certain urolithiasis that appear to be non-infection stones. Some recent studies have reported the presence of bacterial growth in cultures of stones removed by endourological procedures. These findings have led to the hypothesis that UTIs have a role in the formation of stones that are apparently non-infection stones. It is unknown whether these UTIs promoted stone formation, or if the stones became infected after formation. Several in vitro studies and ultrastructural microscopic analyses of urolithiasis are consistent with our hypothesis. If our hypothesis is correct, it could have a great impact on the treatment of urolithiasis. Especially, early identification and treatment of renal infections could help to prevent septic events, which are frequently life-threatening. It could also help to reduce the recurrence of urolithiasis, and thereby reduce health care costs. In conclusion, some evidence suggests that UTIs have a role in the formation of some apparently non-infection urolithiasis. If this is so, it could have a great impact on the treatment and prevention of this disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Other 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 20 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 22 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2018.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Medical Hypotheses
#3,138
of 4,635 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,497
of 343,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medical Hypotheses
#26
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,635 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.