↓ Skip to main content

Chlamydophila pneumoniae infection as a trigger for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Neurología (English Edition), November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chlamydophila pneumoniae infection as a trigger for Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome
Published in
Neurología (English Edition), November 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.nrleng.2022.03.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

E. Bargay Pizarro, M.M. Rosselló Vadell, V. Núñez Gutierrez, M.ª. C. Calles Hernández

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#16,737,737
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Neurología (English Edition)
#369
of 669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#262,319
of 490,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurología (English Edition)
#11
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 490,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.