↓ Skip to main content

Fruit consumption and cardiometabolic risk in the PREDIMED-plus study: A cross-sectional analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Fruit consumption and cardiometabolic risk in the PREDIMED-plus study: A cross-sectional analysis
Published in
Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases, February 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.numecd.2021.02.007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Indira Paz-Graniel, Anna Tresserra-Rimbau, Miguel Á. Martínez-González, Laura Barrubés, Dolores Corella, Júlia Muñoz-Martínez, Dora Romaguera, Jesús Vioque, Ángel M. Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, José A. Martínez, Luís Serra-Majem, Ramon Estruch, Maria R. Bernal-López, José Lapetra, Xavier Pintó, Josep A. Tur, Antonio Garcia-Rios, Blanca Riquelme Gallego, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Pilar Matía-Martín, Lidia Daimiel, Sonsoles Velilla-Zancada, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Emilio Ros, Pilar Buil-Cosiales, Nancy Babio, Rebeca Fernández-Carrión, Karla A. Pérez-Vega, Marga Morey, Laura Torres-Collado, Lucas Tojal-Sierra, Jessica Pérez-López, Itziar Abete, Judith P. Cabrera, Rosa Casas, José C. Fernández-García, José M. Santos-Lozano, Virginia Esteve-Luque, Cristina Bouzas, Cesar I. Fernandez-Lazaro, José V. Sorlí, Gala Freixer, Marian Martín, Montserrat G. Muñoz, Itziar Salaverria-Lete, Estefania Toledo, Olga Castañer, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, the PREDIMED-Plus Investigators

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Master 5 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Professor 3 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 28 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 28 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,451,285
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
#283
of 1,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,817
of 454,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition, Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases
#5
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.