You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The International Natural Product Sciences Taskforce (INPST) and the power of Twitter networking exemplified through #INPST hashtag analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Phytomedicine, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.phymed.2022.154520 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rajeev K Singla, Ronita De, Thomas Efferth, Bruno Mezzetti, Md Sahab Uddin, Sanusi, Fidele Ntie-Kang, Dongdong Wang, Fabien Schultz, Kiran R Kharat, Hari Prasad Devkota, Maurizio Battino, Daniel Sur, Ronan Lordan, Sourav S Patnaik, Christos Tsagkaris, Chandragiri Siva Sai, Surya Kant Tripathi, Mihnea-Alexandru Găman, Mosa E O Ahmed, Elena González-Burgos, Smith B Babiaka, Shravan Kumar Paswan, Joy Ifunanya Odimegwu, Faizan Akram, Jesus Simal-Gandara, Mágali S Urquiza, Aleksei Tikhonov, Himel Mondal, Shailja Singla, Sara Di Lonardo, Eoghan J Mulholland, Merisa Cenanovic, Abdulkadir Yusif Maigoro, Francesca Giampieri, Soojin Lee, Nikolay T Tzvetkov, Anna Maria Louka, Pritt Verma, Hitesh Chopra, Scarlett Perez Olea, Johra Khan, José M Alvarez Suarez, Xiaonan Zheng, Michał Tomczyk, Manoj Kumar Sabnani, Christhian Delfino Villanueva Medina, Garba M Khalid, Hemanth Kumar Boyina, Milen I Georgiev, Claudiu T Supuran, Eduardo Sobarzo-Sánchez, Tai-Ping Fan, Valeria Pittala, Antoni Sureda, Nady Braidy, Gian Luigi Russo, Rosa Anna Vacca, Maciej Banach, Gérard Lizard, Amira Zarrouk, Sonia Hammami, Ilkay Erdogan Orhan, Bharat B Aggarwal, George Perry, Mark Js Miller, Michael Heinrich, Anupam Bishayee, Anake Kijjoa, Nicolas Arkells, David Bredt, Michael Wink, Bernd L Fiebich, Gangarapu Kiran, Andy Wai Kan Yeung, Girish Kumar Gupta, Antonello Santini, Massimo Lucarini, Alessandra Durazzo, Amr El-Demerdash, Albena T Dinkova-Kostova, Alejandro Cifuentes, Eliana B Souto, Muhammad Asim Masoom Zubair, Pravin Badhe, Javier Echeverría, Jarosław Olav Horbańczuk, Olaf K Horbanczuk, Helen Sheridan, Sadeeq Muhammad Sheshe, Anna Maria Witkowska, Ibrahim M Abu-Reidah, Muhammad Riaz, Hammad Ullah, Akolade R Oladipupo, Víctor Lopez, Neeraj Kumar Sethiya, Bhupal Govinda Shrestha, Palaniyandi Ravanan, Subash Chandra Gupta, Qushmua E Alzahrani, Preethidan Dama Sreedhar, Jianbo Xiao, Mohammad Amin Moosavi, Parasuraman Aiya Subramani, Amit Kumar Singh, Ananda Kumar Chettupalli, Jayanta Kumar Patra, Gopal Singh, Tomasz M Karpiński, Fuad Al-Rimawi, Rambod Abiri, Atallah F Ahmed, Davide Barreca, Sharad Vats, Said Amrani, Carmela Fimognari, Andrei Mocan, Lucian Hritcu, Prabhakar Semwal, Md Shiblur Rahaman, Mila Emerald, Akinleye Stephen Akinrinde, Abhilasha Singh, Ashima Joshi, Tanuj Joshi, Shafaat Yar Khan, Gareeballah Osman Adam Balla, Aiping Lu, Sandeep Ramchandra Pai, Imen Ghzaiel, Niyazi Acar, Nour Eddine Es-Safi, Gokhan Zengin, Azazahemad A Kureshi, Arvind Kumar Sharma, Bikash Baral, Neeraj Rani, Philippe Jeandet, Monica Gulati, Bhupinder Kapoor, Yugal Kishore Mohanta, Zahra Emam-Djomeh, Raphael Onuku, Jennifer R Depew, Omar M Atrooz, Bey Hing Goh, Jose Carlos Andrade, Bikramjit Konwar, V J Shine, João Miguel Lousa Dias Ferreira, Jamil Ahmad, Vivek K Chaturvedi, Krystyna Skalicka-Woźniak, Rohit Sharma, Rupesh K Gautam, Sebastian Granica, Salvatore Parisi, Rishabh Kumar, Atanas G Atanasov, Bairong Shen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 72 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 14% |
| India | 4 | 6% |
| Spain | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Korea, Republic of | 2 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | 1% |
| China | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 39 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 58% |
| Scientists | 23 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 48 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,022,655
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Phytomedicine
#97
of 2,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,981
of 443,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Phytomedicine
#2
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.