↓ Skip to main content

Hemoconcentración como predictor de supervivencia al año de ingreso por insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en el registro RICA

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Clínica Española (English Edition), October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hemoconcentración como predictor de supervivencia al año de ingreso por insuficiencia cardiaca aguda en el registro RICA
Published in
Revista Clínica Española (English Edition), October 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.rce.2018.07.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Grau Amorós, F. Formiga, O. Aramburu Bodas, A. Armengou Arxe, A. Conde Martel, M.A. Quesada Simón, R. Oropesa Juanes, J.A. Satué Bartolomé, M.F. Dávila Ramos, M. Montero Pérez-Barquero, Miembros del Registro RICA:, L. Anarte, O. Aramburu, J.C. Arévalo-Lorido, A. Armengou, A. Brase, S. Carrascosa, M. Carrera, J. Casado, J.M. Cerqueiro, A. Conde, M.F. Dávila, J. Díez-Manglano, F. Epelde, F. Formiga, J. Franco, J. Gallego, D. García-Escrivá, A. González-Franco, J. Grau, M.E. Guisado, A. Herrero, P. Llacer, G. López-Castellanos, L. Manzano, A. Martínez-Zapico, M. Montero-Pérez-Barquero, A. Muela, R. Oropesa, C. Pérez-Bocanegra, J.I. Pérez-Calvo, J. Pérez-Silvestre, M.A. Quesada, R. Quirós, E.E. Rodríguez-Ávila, F. Ruiz-Laiglesia, R. Ruiz-Ortega, P. Salamanca, M. Sánchez-Marteles, J.A. Satué, A. Serrado, I. Suárez, J.C. Trullàs

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Librarian 4 19%
Other 3 14%
Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,757,025
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Revista Clínica Española (English Edition)
#63
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,025
of 359,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Clínica Española (English Edition)
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.