↓ Skip to main content

Genotype-phenotype correlations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a multicenter study in Portugal and Spain of the TPM1 p.Arg21Leu variant

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Espanola De Cardiologia, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genotype-phenotype correlations in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a multicenter study in Portugal and Spain of the TPM1 p.Arg21Leu variant
Published in
Revista Espanola De Cardiologia, February 2021
DOI 10.1016/j.rec.2021.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arsonval Lamounier Junior, Alba Guitián González, Alejandro Rodríguez Vilela, Alfredo Repáraz Andrade, Álvaro Rubio Alcaide, Ana Berta Sousa, Carmen Benito López, Diego Alonso García, Germán Fernández Ferro, Inês Cruz, Ivonne Johana Cárdenas Reyes, Joel Salazar-Mendiguchía García, José María Larrañaga-Moreira, Juan Pablo Ochoa, Julián Palomino-Doza, Luis de la Higuera Romero, Marcos Nicolás Cicerchia, María Alejandra Restrepo Córdoba, María Luisa Peña-Peña, Maria Noël Brögger, Marilia Loureiro, María Victoria Mogollón Jiménez, Raquel Bilbao Quesada, Raúl Franco Gutiérrez, Soledad García Hernández, Tomás Ripoll-Vera, Xusto Fernández, Olga Azevedo, Pablo García Pavía, Luis R Lopes, Martín Ortiz, Dulce Brito, Roberto Barriales-Villa, Lorenzo Monserrat Iglesias

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Computer Science 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,176,678
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Revista Espanola De Cardiologia
#85
of 1,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,037
of 452,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Espanola De Cardiologia
#2
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,795 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.