| Title |
Recomendaciones de consenso respecto al soporte respiratorio no invasivo en el paciente adulto con insuficiencia respiratoria aguda secundaria a infección por SARS-CoV-2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista española de anestesiología y reanimación, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.redar.2020.03.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Cinesi Gómez, Ó. Peñuelas Rodríguez, M.l Luján Torné, C. Egea Santaolalla, J.F. Masa Jiménez, J. García Fernández, J.M. Carratalá Perales, S.B. Heili-Frades, M. Ferrer Monreal, J.M. de Andrés Nilsson, E. Lista Arias, J.L. Sánchez Rocamora, J.I. Garrote, M.J. Zamorano Serrano, M. González Martínez, E. Farrero Muñoz, O. Mediano San Andrés, G. Rialp Cervera, A. Mas Serra, G. Hernández Martínez, C. de Haro López, O. Roca Gas, R. Ferrer Roca, A. Romero Berrocal, C. Ferrando Ortola |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 20 | 57% |
| Argentina | 2 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Guatemala | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 52 | 26% |
| Unknown | 54 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 74 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 63 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 428. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#67,779
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Revista española de anestesiología y reanimación
#1
of 864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,530
of 388,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista española de anestesiología y reanimación
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 864 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.