↓ Skip to main content

Abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and interstitial lung disease: A national multicenter study of 63 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 1,714)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and interstitial lung disease: A national multicenter study of 63 patients
Published in
Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism, January 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2017.12.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Fernández-Díaz, Javier Loricera, Santos Castañeda, Raquel López-Mejías, Clara Ojeda-García, Alejandro Olivé, Samantha Rodríguez-Muguruza, Patricia E Carreira, Trinidad Pérez-Sandoval, Miriam Retuerto, Evelin C Cervantes-Pérez, Bryan J Flores-Robles, Blanca Hernández-Cruz, Ana Urruticoechea, Olga Maíz-Alonso, Luis Arboleya, Gema Bonilla, Íñigo Hernández-Rodríguez, Desirée Palma, Concepción Delgado, Rosa Expósito-Molinero, Ana Ruibal-Escribano, Belén Álvarez-Rodríguez, Juan Blanco-Madrigal, José A Bernal, Paloma Vela-Casasempere, Manuel Rodríguez-Gómez, Concepción Fito, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán, Javier Narváez, Manuel Moreno, Mireia López-Corbeto, Natalia Mena-Vázquez, Clara Aguilera-Cros, Susana Romero-Yuste, Sergi Ordóñez, Ignacio Villa-Blanco, M Carmen Gonzélez-Vela, Víctor Mora-Cuesta, Natalia Palmou-Fontana, José L Hernández, Miguel A González-Gay, Ricardo Blanco

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most serious complications of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the present study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of abatacept (ABA) in patients with ILD associated to RA. National multicenter, non-controlled, open-label registry study of RA patients with ILD treated with ABA. 63 patients (36 women) with RA-associated ILD undergoing ABA therapy were studied. The mean ± standard deviation age at the time of the study was 63.2 ± 9.8 years. The median duration of RA and ILD from diagnosis were 6.8 and 1 year, respectively. RA was seropositive in 55 patients (87.3%). In 15 (23.8%) of 63 patients the development of ILD was closely related to the administration of synthetic or biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. After a follow-up of 9.4 ± 3.2 months, two-thirds of patients remained stable whereas one-quarter experienced improvement in the Modified Medical Research Council scale. At that time forced vital capacity remained stable in almost two-thirds of patents and improved in one out of five patients assessed. Also, diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide remained stable in almost two-thirds and showed improvement in a quarter of the patients assessed. At 12 months, 50% of the 22 patients in whom chest HRCT scan was performed due persistence of respiratory symptoms showed stabilization, 8 (36.4%) improvement and 3 worsening of the HRCT scan pattern. Eleven of 63 patients had to discontinue ABA, mainly due to adverse events. ABA appears to be an effective in RA-associated ILD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 19%
Other 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 6%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 44 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 59 44%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 50 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,021,662
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism
#44
of 1,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,323
of 449,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.