You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tocilizumab in giant cell arteritis. Observational, open-label multicenter study of 134 patients in clinical practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.01.003 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mónica Calderón-Goercke, Javier Loricera, Vicente Aldasoro, Santos Castañeda, Ignacio Villa, Alicia Humbría, Clara Moriano, Susana Romero-Yuste, Javier Narváez, Catalina Gómez-Arango, Eva Pérez-Pampín, Rafael Melero, Elena Becerra-Fernández, Marcelino Revenga, Noelia Álvarez-Rivas, Carles Galisteo, Francisca Sivera, Alejandro Olivé-Marqués, María Álvarez Del Buergo, Luisa Marena-Rojas, Carlos Fernández-López, Francisco Navarro, Enrique Raya, Eva Galindez-Agirregoikoa, Beatriz Arca, Roser Solans-Laqué, Arantxa Conesa, Cristina Hidalgo, Carlos Vázquez, José Andrés Román-Ivorra, Pau Lluch, Sara Manrique-Arija, Paloma Vela, Eugenio De Miguel, Carmen Torres-Martín, Juan Carlos Nieto, Carmen Ordas-Calvo, Eva Salgado-Pérez, Cristina Luna-Gomez, F Javier Toyos-Sáenz de Miera, Nagore Fernández-Llanio, Antonio García, Carmen Larena, Natalia Palmou-Fontana, Vanesa Calvo-Río, Diana Prieto-Peña, Carmen González-Vela, Alfonso Corrales, María Varela-García, Elena Aurrecoechea, Raquel Dos Santos, Ángel García-Manzanares, Norberto Ortego, Sabela Fernández, Francisco Ortiz-Sanjuán, Montserrat Corteguera, José L Hernández, Miguel Á González-Gay, Ricardo Blanco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 60% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| France | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 56 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,131,889
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism
#57
of 1,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,092
of 444,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Arthritis & Rheumatism
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.