You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Syndemic effects of HIV risk behaviours: results from the NHANES study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiology & Infection, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s095026881900133x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
L. Smith, C. Cao, X. Zong, D. T. McDermott, S. Stefanac, S. Haider, S. E. Jackson, N. Veronese, G. F. López-Sánchez, A. Koyanagi, L. Yang, I. Grabovac |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Austria | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 72 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 10% |
| Psychology | 5 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2019.
All research outputs
#14,396,821
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiology & Infection
#3,081
of 4,680 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,066
of 360,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiology & Infection
#16
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,680 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.