↓ Skip to main content

Are Interventions Theory-Based? Development of a Theory Coding Scheme

Overview of attention for article published in Health Psychology, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
614 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
831 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are Interventions Theory-Based? Development of a Theory Coding Scheme
Published in
Health Psychology, January 2010
DOI 10.1037/a0016939
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Michie, Andrew Prestwich

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 831 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 14 2%
United States 8 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 798 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 179 22%
Student > Master 128 15%
Researcher 111 13%
Student > Bachelor 55 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 48 6%
Other 137 16%
Unknown 173 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 229 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 95 11%
Social Sciences 90 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 6%
Computer Science 24 3%
Other 137 16%
Unknown 203 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2019.
All research outputs
#2,302,922
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Health Psychology
#383
of 2,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,652
of 177,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Psychology
#10
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,915 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.