You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microstructural Integrity of a Pathway Connecting the Prefrontal Cortex and Amygdala Moderates the Association Between Cognitive Reappraisal and Negative Emotions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emotion, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1037/emo0000447 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tracy C. d’Arbeloff, M. Justin Kim, Annchen R. Knodt, Spenser R. Radtke, Bartholomew D. Brigidi, Ahmad R. Hariri |
| Abstract |
Cognitive reappraisal is a commonly used form of emotion regulation that utilizes frontal-executive control to reframe an approaching emotional event to moderate its potential psychological impact. Use of cognitive reappraisal has been associated with diminished experience of anxiety and depressive symptoms, as well as greater overall well-being. Using data from a study of 647 healthy young adults, we provide initial evidence that an association between typical use of cognitive reappraisal in daily life and the experience of anxiety and depressive symptoms is moderated by the microstructural integrity of the uncinate fasciculus, which provides a major anatomical link between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex. Our findings are consistent with the nature of top-down regulation of bottom-up negative emotions and suggest the uncinate fasciculus may be a useful target in the search for biomarkers predicting not only disorder risk but also response to psychotherapy utilizing cognitive reappraisal. (PsycINFO Database Record |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 104 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 12% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 36 | 35% |
| Neuroscience | 16 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 31 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2018.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Emotion
#1,342
of 2,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,802
of 345,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emotion
#25
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.