↓ Skip to main content

Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, May 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
711 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1063 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins
Published in
Nature, May 2001
DOI 10.1038/35079066
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. D. Thomas, E. J. Bodsworth, R. J. Wilson, A. D. Simmons, Z. G. Davies, M. Musche, L. Conradt

Abstract

Many animals are regarded as relatively sedentary and specialized in marginal parts of their geographical distributions. They are expected to be slow at colonizing new habitats. Despite this, the cool margins of many species' distributions have expanded rapidly in association with recent climate warming. We examined four insect species that have expanded their geographical ranges in Britain over the past 20 years. Here we report that two butterfly species have increased the variety of habitat types that they can colonize, and that two bush cricket species show increased fractions of longer-winged (dispersive) individuals in recently founded populations. Both ecological and evolutionary processes are probably responsible for these changes. Increased habitat breadth and dispersal tendencies have resulted in about 3- to 15-fold increases in expansion rates, allowing these insects to cross habitat disjunctions that would have represented major or complete barriers to dispersal before the expansions started. The emergence of dispersive phenotypes will increase the speed at which species invade new environments, and probably underlies the responses of many species to both past and future climate change.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,063 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 24 2%
United Kingdom 18 2%
France 11 1%
Switzerland 9 <1%
Brazil 9 <1%
Germany 7 <1%
Spain 5 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
Hungary 4 <1%
Other 34 3%
Unknown 937 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 245 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 242 23%
Student > Master 126 12%
Student > Bachelor 101 10%
Professor 55 5%
Other 198 19%
Unknown 96 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 611 57%
Environmental Science 218 21%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 28 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 23 2%
Social Sciences 11 1%
Other 40 4%
Unknown 132 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2015.
All research outputs
#1,128,729
of 25,795,662 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#33,808
of 98,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#685
of 42,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#29
of 344 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,795,662 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 344 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.