You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Bright spots among the world’s coral reefs
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1038/nature18607 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Joshua E. Cinner, Cindy Huchery, M. Aaron MacNeil, Nicholas A.J. Graham, Tim R. McClanahan, Joseph Maina, Eva Maire, John N. Kittinger, Christina C. Hicks, Camilo Mora, Edward H. Allison, Stephanie D’Agata, Andrew Hoey, David A. Feary, Larry Crowder, Ivor D. Williams, Michel Kulbicki, Laurent Vigliola, Laurent Wantiez, Graham Edgar, Rick D. Stuart-Smith, Stuart A. Sandin, Alison L. Green, Marah J. Hardt, Maria Beger, Alan Friedlander, Stuart J. Campbell, Katherine E. Holmes, Shaun K. Wilson, Eran Brokovich, Andrew J. Brooks, Juan J. Cruz-Motta, David J. Booth, Pascale Chabanet, Charlie Gough, Mark Tupper, Sebastian C. A. Ferse, U. Rashid Sumaila, David Mouillot |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 319 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 42 | 13% |
United Kingdom | 34 | 11% |
Australia | 24 | 8% |
Japan | 22 | 7% |
Sweden | 7 | 2% |
Canada | 5 | 2% |
Italy | 4 | 1% |
France | 3 | <1% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
Other | 37 | 12% |
Unknown | 138 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 214 | 67% |
Scientists | 88 | 28% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 15 | 5% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,232 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | <1% |
France | 3 | <1% |
Brazil | 3 | <1% |
Italy | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Guadeloupe | 1 | <1% |
Bermuda | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | <1% |
Unknown | 1204 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 228 | 19% |
Student > Master | 213 | 17% |
Researcher | 198 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 145 | 12% |
Other | 56 | 5% |
Other | 171 | 14% |
Unknown | 221 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 380 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 358 | 29% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 63 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 48 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 2% |
Other | 78 | 6% |
Unknown | 277 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1126. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2023.
All research outputs
#13,737
of 26,061,338 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,377
of 99,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198
of 370,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#27
of 990 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,061,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 103.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,167 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 990 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.