You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rare disruptive mutations and their contribution to the heritable risk of colorectal cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms11883 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Chubb, Peter Broderick, Sara E. Dobbins, Matthew Frampton, Ben Kinnersley, Steven Penegar, Amy Price, Yussanne P. Ma, Amy L. Sherborne, Claire Palles, Maria N. Timofeeva, D. Timothy Bishop, Malcolm G. Dunlop, Ian Tomlinson, Richard S. Houlston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 40% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 14 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 58% |
| Scientists | 11 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 22% |
| Researcher | 24 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 33 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#358,337
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#5,591
of 58,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,092
of 369,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#102
of 799 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 799 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.