You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The circadian clock rephases during lateral root organ initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Communications, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ncomms8641 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ute Voß, Michael H. Wilson, Kim Kenobi, Peter D. Gould, Fiona C. Robertson, Wendy A. Peer, Mikaël Lucas, Kamal Swarup, Ilda Casimiro, Tara J. Holman, Darren M. Wells, Benjamin Péret, Tatsuaki Goh, Hidehiro Fukaki, T. Charlie Hodgman, Laurent Laplaze, Karen J. Halliday, Karin Ljung, Angus S. Murphy, Anthony J. Hall, Alex A. R. Webb, Malcolm J. Bennett |
| Abstract |
The endogenous circadian clock enables organisms to adapt their growth and development to environmental changes. Here we describe how the circadian clock is employed to coordinate responses to the key signal auxin during lateral root (LR) emergence. In the model plant, Arabidopsis thaliana, LRs originate from a group of stem cells deep within the root, necessitating that new organs emerge through overlying root tissues. We report that the circadian clock is rephased during LR development. Metabolite and transcript profiling revealed that the circadian clock controls the levels of auxin and auxin-related genes including the auxin response repressor IAA14 and auxin oxidase AtDAO2. Plants lacking or overexpressing core clock components exhibit LR emergence defects. We conclude that the circadian clock acts to gate auxin signalling during LR development to facilitate organ emergence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 16% |
| United States | 4 | 13% |
| Japan | 3 | 10% |
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 17 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 58% |
| Scientists | 9 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 248 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 26% |
| Researcher | 39 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 148 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 16% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | <1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 48 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,207,343
of 25,760,414 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#18,754
of 58,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,300
of 276,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#193
of 789 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,760,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 58,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 789 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.