↓ Skip to main content

Clinical development of new drug–radiotherapy combinations

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
84 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
240 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical development of new drug–radiotherapy combinations
Published in
Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, June 2016
DOI 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricky A. Sharma, Ruth Plummer, Julie K. Stock, Tessa A. Greenhalgh, Ozlem Ataman, Stephen Kelly, Robert Clay, Richard A. Adams, Richard D. Baird, Lucinda Billingham, Sarah R. Brown, Sean Buckland, Helen Bulbeck, Anthony J. Chalmers, Glen Clack, Aaron N. Cranston, Lars Damstrup, Roberta Ferraldeschi, Martin D. Forster, Julian Golec, Russell M. Hagan, Emma Hall, Axel-R. Hanauske, Kevin J. Harrington, Tom Haswell, Maria A. Hawkins, Tim Illidge, Hazel Jones, Andrew S. Kennedy, Fiona McDonald, Thorsten Melcher, James P. B. O'Connor, John R. Pollard, Mark P. Saunders, David Sebag-Montefiore, Melanie Smitt, John Staffurth, Ian J. Stratford, Stephen R. Wedge

Abstract

In countries with the best cancer outcomes, approximately 60% of patients receive radiotherapy as part of their treatment, which is one of the most cost-effective cancer treatments. Notably, around 40% of cancer cures include the use of radiotherapy, either as a single modality or combined with other treatments. Radiotherapy can provide enormous benefit to patients with cancer. In the past decade, significant technical advances, such as image-guided radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy, and proton therapy enable higher doses of radiotherapy to be delivered to the tumour with significantly lower doses to normal surrounding tissues. However, apart from the combination of traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy with radiotherapy, little progress has been made in identifying and defining optimal targeted therapy and radiotherapy combinations to improve the efficacy of cancer treatment. The National Cancer Research Institute Clinical and Translational Radiotherapy Research Working Group (CTRad) formed a Joint Working Group with representatives from academia, industry, patient groups and regulatory bodies to address this lack of progress and to publish recommendations for future clinical research. Herein, we highlight the Working Group's consensus recommendations to increase the number of novel drugs being successfully registered in combination with radiotherapy to improve clinical outcomes for patients with cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 84 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 350 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 68 19%
Researcher 52 15%
Student > Master 41 12%
Other 35 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 4%
Other 60 17%
Unknown 82 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 4%
Other 64 18%
Unknown 102 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#471,599
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#104
of 2,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,140
of 354,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology
#1
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,842 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.