You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A simple score to predict early severe infections in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Blood Cancer Journal, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41408-022-00652-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cristina Encinas, José-Ángel Hernandez-Rivas, Albert Oriol, Laura Rosiñol, María-Jesús Blanchard, José-María Bellón, Ramón García-Sanz, Javier de la Rubia, Ana López de la Guía, Ana Jímenez-Ubieto, Isidro Jarque, Belén Iñigo, Victoria Dourdil, Felipe de Arriba, Clara Cuéllar Pérez-Ávila, Yolanda Gonzalez, Miguel-Teodoro Hernández, Joan Bargay, Miguel Granell, Paula Rodríguez-Otero, Maialen Silvent, Carmen Cabrera, Rafael Rios, Adrián Alegre, Mercedes Gironella, Marta-Sonia Gonzalez, Anna Sureda, Antonia Sampol, Enrique M. Ocio, Isabel Krsnik, Antonio García, Aránzazu García-Mateo, Joan-Alfons Soler, Jesús Martín, José-María Arguiñano, María-Victoria Mateos, Joan Bladé, Jesús F. San-Miguel, Juan-José Lahuerta, Joaquín Martínez-López |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 33% |
| Mexico | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Algeria | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 72% |
| Scientists | 4 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 35% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,090,527
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from Blood Cancer Journal
#100
of 1,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,171
of 448,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Blood Cancer Journal
#3
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,303 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.