↓ Skip to main content

Acoustic allometry revisited: morphological determinants of fundamental frequency in primate vocal production

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Acoustic allometry revisited: morphological determinants of fundamental frequency in primate vocal production
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41598-017-11000-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maxime Garcia, Christian T. Herbst, Daniel L. Bowling, Jacob C. Dunn, W. Tecumseh Fitch

Abstract

A fundamental issue in the evolution of communication is the degree to which signals convey accurate ("honest") information about the signaler. In bioacoustics, the assumption that fundamental frequency (f o) should correlate with the body size of the caller is widespread, but this belief has been challenged by various studies, possibly because larynx size and body size can vary independently. In the present comparative study, we conducted excised larynx experiments to investigate this hypothesis rigorously and explore the determinants of f o. Using specimens from eleven primate species, we carried out an inter-specific investigation, examining correlations between the minimum f o produced by the sound source, body size and vocal fold length (VFL). We found that, across species, VFL predicted minimum f o much better than body size, clearly demonstrating the potential for decoupling between larynx size and body size in primates. These findings shed new light on the diversity of primate vocalizations and vocal morphology, highlighting the importance of vocal physiology in understanding the evolution of mammal vocal communication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 35%
Psychology 5 7%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Linguistics 3 4%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,075,387
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#26,116
of 124,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,278
of 315,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#1,123
of 5,601 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,601 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.