| Title |
CoV2-ID, a MIQE-compliant sub-20-min 5-plex RT-PCR assay targeting SARS-CoV-2 for the diagnosis of COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-020-79233-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephen Bustin, Amy Coward, Garry Sadler, Louise Teare, Tania Nolan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 13% |
| United States | 6 | 11% |
| Canada | 4 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 80% |
| Scientists | 8 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
| Researcher | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#331,451
of 25,712,965 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#3,760
of 142,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,112
of 513,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#140
of 4,504 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,712,965 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,579 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 513,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,504 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.