You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consumption of caffeinated beverages and kidney function decline in an elderly Mediterranean population with metabolic syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-88028-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrés Díaz-López, Indira Paz-Graniel, Verónica Ruiz, Estefanía Toledo, Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Dolores Corella, Olga Castañer, J. Alfredo Martínez, Ángel M. Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, Jesús Vioque, Dora Romaguera, José López-Miranda, Ramon Estruch, Francisco J. Tinahones, José Lapetra, Luís Serra-Majem, Aurora Bueno-Cavanillas, Josep A. Tur, Vicente Martín Sánchez, Xavier Pintó, Miguel Delgado-Rodríguez, Pilar Matía-Martín, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Lidia Daimiel, Tania Fernandez Villa, Emilio Ros, Sonia Eguaras, Nancy Babio, Jose V. Sorlí, Albert Goday, Itziar Abete, Lucas Tojal Sierra, Francisco Javier Barón-López, Laura Torres-Collado, Marga Morey, Antonio Garcia-Rios, Rosa Casas, María Rosa Bernal-López, José Manuel Santos-Lozano, Adela Navarro, Jose I. Gonzalez, María Dolores Zomeño, Maria Angeles Zulet, Jessica Vaquero Luna, Raul Ramallal, Montse Fitó, Jordi Salas-Salvadó |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 11 | 55% |
| Japan | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Greece | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 20% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 27 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2023.
All research outputs
#886,760
of 25,753,578 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#9,395
of 142,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,351
of 455,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#282
of 4,732 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,732 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.