You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical characterization and outcomes of 85 patients with neurosarcoidosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41598-021-92967-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Manuel Ramos-Casals, Roberto Pérez-Alvarez, Belchin Kostov, Ricardo Gómez-de-la-Torre, Carlos Feijoo-Massó, Joel Chara-Cervantes, Blanca Pinilla, Andrés González-García, José-Salvador Garcia-Morillo, Miguel López-Dupla, Begoña De-Escalante, Javier Rascón, Patricia Perez-Guerrero, Mariona Bonet, Gracia Cruz-Caparrós, Ana Alguacil, José-Luis Callejas, Eva Calvo, Cristina Soler, Angel Robles, Borja de Miguel-Campo, Pedro Oliva-Nacarino, Jorge Estela-Herrero, Lucio Pallarés, Pilar Brito-Zerón, Yolanda Blanco |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 50% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Peru | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 35% |
| Scientists | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 5 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,019,795
of 24,598,501 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#18,214
of 134,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,504
of 432,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#569
of 4,305 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,598,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 134,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,305 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.