↓ Skip to main content

Primary sequence contribution to the optical function of the eye lens

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary sequence contribution to the optical function of the eye lens
Published in
Scientific Reports, June 2014
DOI 10.1038/srep05195
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Mahendiran, C. Elie, J.-C. Nebel, A. Ryan, B. K. Pierscionek

Abstract

The crystallins have relatively high refractive increments compared to other proteins. The Greek key motif in βγ-crystallins was compared with that in other proteins, using predictive analysis from a protein database, to see whether this may be related to the refractive increment. Crystallins with Greek keys motifs have significantly higher refractive increments and more salt bridges than other proteins with Greek key domains. Specific amino acid substitutions: lysine and glutamic acid residues are replaced by arginine and aspartic acid, respectively as refractive increment increases. These trends are also seen in S-crystallins suggesting that the primary sequence of crystallins may be specifically enriched with amino acids with appropriate values of refractive increment to meet optical requirements. Comparison of crystallins from five species: two aquatic and three terrestrial shows that the lysine/arginine correlation with refractive increment occurs in all species investigated. This may be linked with formation and maintenance of salt bridges.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Professor 3 10%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 23%
Chemistry 7 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,373,576
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#92,811
of 122,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,337
of 228,645 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#614
of 853 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 122,742 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,645 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 853 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.