You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gamma and beta frequency oscillations in response to novel auditory stimuli: A comparison of human electroencephalogram (EEG) data with in vitro models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.120162397 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Corinna Haenschel, Torsten Baldeweg, Rodney J. Croft, Miles Whittington, John Gruzelier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 348 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| France | 4 | 1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 316 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 100 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 79 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 32 | 9% |
| Professor | 25 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 78 | 22% |
| Neuroscience | 71 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 9% |
| Engineering | 22 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 8% |
| Unknown | 50 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2016.
All research outputs
#6,587,541
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#59,442
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,026
of 41,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#242
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.