↓ Skip to main content

Rapid growth of organic aerosol nanoparticles over a wide tropospheric temperature range

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rapid growth of organic aerosol nanoparticles over a wide tropospheric temperature range
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, August 2018
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1807604115
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dominik Stolzenburg, Lukas Fischer, Alexander L. Vogel, Martin Heinritzi, Meredith Schervish, Mario Simon, Andrea C. Wagner, Lubna Dada, Lauri R. Ahonen, Antonio Amorim, Andrea Baccarini, Paulus S. Bauer, Bernhard Baumgartner, Anton Bergen, Federico Bianchi, Martin Breitenlechner, Sophia Brilke, Stephany Buenrostro Mazon, Dexian Chen, António Dias, Danielle C. Draper, Jonathan Duplissy, Imad El Haddad, Henning Finkenzeller, Carla Frege, Claudia Fuchs, Olga Garmash, Hamish Gordon, Xucheng He, Johanna Helm, Victoria Hofbauer, Christopher R. Hoyle, Changhyuk Kim, Jasper Kirkby, Jenni Kontkanen, Andreas Kürten, Janne Lampilahti, Michael Lawler, Katrianne Lehtipalo, Markus Leiminger, Huajun Mai, Serge Mathot, Bernhard Mentler, Ugo Molteni, Wei Nie, Tuomo Nieminen, John B. Nowak, Andrea Ojdanic, Antti Onnela, Monica Passananti, Tuukka Petäjä, Lauriane L. J. Quéléver, Matti P. Rissanen, Nina Sarnela, Simon Schallhart, Christian Tauber, António Tomé, Robert Wagner, Mingyi Wang, Lena Weitz, Daniela Wimmer, Mao Xiao, Chao Yan, Penglin Ye, Qiaozhi Zha, Urs Baltensperger, Joachim Curtius, Josef Dommen, Richard C. Flagan, Markku Kulmala, James N. Smith, Douglas R. Worsnop, Armin Hansel, Neil M. Donahue, Paul M. Winkler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 165 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 32%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Master 15 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 7 4%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 40 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 38 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 21 13%
Chemistry 19 12%
Physics and Astronomy 10 6%
Engineering 9 5%
Other 17 10%
Unknown 51 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#1,064,646
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#16,103
of 103,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,295
of 346,692 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#285
of 924 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,692 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 924 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.