↓ Skip to main content

PERIOD-controlled deadenylation of the timeless transcript in the Drosophila circadian clock

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PERIOD-controlled deadenylation of the timeless transcript in the Drosophila circadian clock
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2019
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1814418116
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brigitte Grima, Christian Papin, Béatrice Martin, Elisabeth Chélot, Prishila Ponien, Eric Jacquet, François Rouyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 26%
Student > Bachelor 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 16%
Neuroscience 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 13 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#13,920,558
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#86,241
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,677
of 358,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#840
of 1,070 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,070 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.