| Title |
Early dinner or “dinner like a pauper”: Evidence, the habitual time of the largest meal of the day – dinner – is predisposing to severe COVID-19 outcome – death
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/07420528.2020.1772810 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sergio Verd, Sara Beiro, Marisa Fernandez-Bernabeu, Jaume Ponce-Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 11% |
| Spain | 8 | 9% |
| India | 5 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 44 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 69 | 81% |
| Scientists | 7 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 51 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 45 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Psychology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 56 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2021.
All research outputs
#677,807
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research
#77
of 1,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,868
of 436,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,030 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.