Title |
Adherence predictors in an Internet-based Intervention program for depression
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, September 2017
|
DOI | 10.1080/16506073.2017.1366546 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adoración Castro, Yolanda López-del-Hoyo, Christian Peake, Fermín Mayoral, Cristina Botella, Javier García-Campayo, Rosa María Baños, Raquel Nogueira-Arjona, Miquel Roca, Margalida Gili |
Abstract |
Internet-delivered psychotherapy has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of depression. Nevertheless, the study of the adherence in this type of the treatment reported divergent results. The main objective of this study is to analyze predictors of adherence in a primary care Internet-based intervention for depression in Spain. A multi-center, three arm, parallel, randomized controlled trial was conducted with 194 depressive patients, who were allocated in self-guided or supported-guided intervention. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were gathered using a case report form. The Mini international neuropsychiatric interview diagnoses major depression. Beck Depression Inventory was used to assess depression severity. The visual analogic scale assesses the respondent's self-rated health and Short Form Health Survey was used to measure the health-related quality of life. Age results a predictor variable for both intervention groups (with and without therapist support). Perceived health is a negative predictor of adherence for the self-guided intervention when change in depression severity was included in the model. Change in depression severity results a predictor of adherence in the support-guided intervention. Our findings demonstrate that in our sample, there are differences in sociodemographic and clinical variables between active and dropout participants and we provide adherence predictors in each intervention condition of this Internet-based program for depression (self-guided and support-guided). It is important to point that further research in this area is essential to improve tailored interventions and to know specific patients groups can benefit from these interventions. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 3 | 50% |
United States | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 209 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 12% |
Researcher | 21 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 7% |
Other | 33 | 16% |
Unknown | 79 | 38% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 67 | 32% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
Other | 16 | 8% |
Unknown | 90 | 43% |