↓ Skip to main content

The impact of theory on the effectiveness of worksite physical activity interventions: a meta-analysis and meta-regression

Overview of attention for article published in Health Psychology Review, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
182 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of theory on the effectiveness of worksite physical activity interventions: a meta-analysis and meta-regression
Published in
Health Psychology Review, March 2012
DOI 10.1080/17437199.2010.533441
Authors

Natalie Taylor, Mark Conner, Rebecca Lawton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 223 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 19%
Student > Master 39 17%
Researcher 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 33 14%
Unknown 53 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 55 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 11%
Social Sciences 25 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 7%
Sports and Recreations 15 7%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 67 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2015.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Health Psychology Review
#275
of 347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,530
of 170,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Psychology Review
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.