↓ Skip to main content

Endoscopic Cauterization with Pneumatic Distension for Piriform Fossa Sinus Tracts

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Endoscopic Cauterization with Pneumatic Distension for Piriform Fossa Sinus Tracts
Published in
Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques, May 2018
DOI 10.1089/lap.2017.0286
Pubmed ID
Authors

María Elena Carazo Palacios, Carlos Gutiérrez, Ignacio Miró, Georgina Sanchís, Vicente Ibáñez, Juan José Vila

Abstract

Piriform fossa sinus tracts (PFSTs) are a cause of recurrent neck infections in the pediatric population. Conventional management required open resection, but over the last years minimally invasive approaches have been reported in an attempt to endoscopically obliterate the PFST, using different methods such as electrocautery, laser, trichloroacetic acid, or silver nitrate. We undertook a retrospective review of the medical records of 12 children (aged 4 months to 14 years) with PFSTs treated with endoscopic sclerosis with diathermy (ESD) between 2010 and 2016 at a tertiary care children's hospital. We also present a technical modification of ESD, using continuous infusion of airflow through the gastroscopy, to distend the piriform sinus and facilitate its recognition. PFST obliteration was performed using diathermy through a guide wire. Clinical presentation of the 12 affected children included neck tumor (7 [58%]), neck abscesses (4 [33%]), and thyroiditis (5 [41%]). All lesions occurred on the left side. All patients underwent both ultrasonography and barium esophagography (the latter being positive only in 50%). Two patients were treated with ESD after the open approach had failed. There was no procedure-related morbidity. One patient had a recurrence (positive barium swallow without symptoms). The success rate of this procedure in our series was 91% with one attempt and 100% with two attempts. In our experience, treatment of PFST with ESD is a reproducible, noninvasive, and an effective option. ESD could be considered a primary approach and also for revision after open surgery has failed in these patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,350,971
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques
#367
of 856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,390
of 339,176 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Endosurgery & Innovative Techniques
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 856 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,176 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.