You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Relationship Between Bacterial Strain Type, Host Biomarkers, and Mortality in Clostridium difficile Infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/cid/cit127 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Sarah Walker, David W. Eyre, David H. Wyllie, Kate E. Dingle, David Griffiths, Brian Shine, Sarah Oakley, Lily O'Connor, John Finney, Alison Vaughan, Derrick W. Crook, Mark H. Wilcox, Tim E. A. Peto, on behalf of the Infections in Oxfordshire Research Database |
| Abstract |
Despite substantial interest in biomarkers, their impact on clinical outcomes and variation with bacterial strain has rarely been explored using integrated databases. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 135 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 19 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#2,290,573
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#3,906
of 16,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,375
of 207,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#31
of 171 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 171 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.