You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ceftazidime, Carbapenems, or Piperacillin-tazobactam as Single Definitive Therapy for Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infection: A Multisite Retrospective Study.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Infectious Diseases, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/cid/ciz668 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tanya Babich, Pontus Naucler, John Karlsson Valik, Christian G Giske, Natividad Benito, Ruben Cardona, Alba Rivera, Celine Pulcini, Manal Abdel Fattah, Justine Haquin, Alasdair Macgowan, Sally Grier, Julie Gibbs, Bibiana Chazan, Anna Yanovskay, Ronen Ben Ami, Michal Landes, Lior Nesher, Adi Zaidman-Shimshovitz, Kate McCarthy, David L Paterson, Evelina Tacconelli, Michael Buhl, Susanna Mauer, Jesus Rodriguez-Bano, Isabel Morales, Antonio Oliver, Enrique Ruiz De Gopegui, Angela Cano, Isabel Machuca, Monica Gozalo-Marguello, Luis Martinez Martinez, Eva M Gonzalez-Barbera, Iris Gomez Alfaro, Miguel Salavert, Bojana Beovic, Andreja Saje, Manica Mueller-Premru, Leonardo Pagani, Virginie Vitrat, Diamantis Kofteridis, Maria Zacharioudaki, Sofia Maraki, Yulia Weissman, Mical Paul, Yaakov Dickstein, Leonard Leibovici, Dafna Yahav |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 195 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 28 | 14% |
| United States | 23 | 12% |
| Japan | 14 | 7% |
| Mexico | 7 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| South Africa | 4 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 3 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 87 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 148 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 13% |
| Scientists | 20 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 19 | 25% |
| Unknown | 16 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#348,548
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#695
of 16,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,751
of 344,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Infectious Diseases
#8
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,950 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.