↓ Skip to main content

Amphilimus- vs. zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the SUGAR trial

Overview of attention for article published in European Heart Journal, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
99 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Amphilimus- vs. zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the SUGAR trial
Published in
European Heart Journal, December 2021
DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rafael Romaguera, Pablo Salinas, Josep Gomez-Lara, Salvatore Brugaletta, Antonio Gómez-Menchero, Miguel A Romero, Sergio García-Blas, Raymundo Ocaranza, Pascual Bordes, Marcelo Jiménez Kockar, Neus Salvatella, Victor A Jiménez-Díaz, Mar Alameda, Ramiro Trillo, Dae Hyun Lee, Pedro Martín, María López-Benito, Alfonso Freites, Virginia Pascual-Tejerina, Felipe Hernández-Hernández, Bruno García del Blanco, Mohsen Mohandes, Francisco Bosa, Eduardo Pinar, Gerard Roura, Josep Comin-Colet, Antonio Fernández-Ortiz, Carlos Macaya, Xavier Rossello, Manel Sabate, Stuart J Pocock, Joan A Gómez-Hospital, Carlos H Salazar, Luis Ortega-Paz, José M de la Torre Hernández, Armando Pérez de Prado, Juan Sanchis, Soledad Ojeda, José L Ferreiro, Montserrat Gracida, Lara Fuentes, Luis Teruel, Guillem Muntané-Carol, Rocío Castillo-Poyo, Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo, Angel Cequier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 99 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Unspecified 3 7%
Librarian 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 18 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 37%
Unspecified 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 20 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 140. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#296,758
of 25,405,598 outputs
Outputs from European Heart Journal
#503
of 11,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,110
of 514,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Heart Journal
#22
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,405,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 514,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.