↓ Skip to main content

Cardiometabolic Therapy and Mortality in Very Old Patients With Diabetes Hospitalized due to COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
34 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiometabolic Therapy and Mortality in Very Old Patients With Diabetes Hospitalized due to COVID-19
Published in
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, May 2021
DOI 10.1093/gerona/glab124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Manuel Ramos-Rincón, Luis M Pérez-Belmonte, Francisco Javier Carrasco-Sánchez, Sergio Jansen-Chaparro, Mercedes De-Sousa-Baena, José Bueno-Fonseca, Maria Pérez-Aguilar, Coral Arévalo-Cañas, Marta Bacete Cebrian, Manuel Méndez-Bailón, Isabel Fiteni Mera, Andrés González García, Francisco Navarro Romero, Carlota Tuñón de Almeida, Gemma Muñiz Nicolás, Amara González Noya, Almudena Hernández Milian, Gema María García García, José Nicolás Alcalá Pedrajas, Virginia Herrero García, Luis Corral-Gudino, Pere Comas Casanova, Héctor Meijide Míguez, José Manuel Casas-Rojo, Ricardo Gómez-Huelgas, SEMI-COVID-19 Network

Abstract

The effects of cardiometabolic drugs on the prognosis of diabetic patients with COVID-19, especially very old patients, are not well-known. This work aims to analyze the association between preadmission cardiometabolic therapy (antidiabetic, antiaggregant, antihypertensive, and lipid-lowering drugs) and in-hospital mortality among patients ≥80 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus hospitalized for COVID-19. We conducted a nationwide, multicenter, observational study in patients ≥80 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus hospitalized for COVID-19 between March 1 and May 29, 2020. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. A multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the association between preadmission cardiometabolic therapy and in-hospital mortality. Of the 2,763 patients ≥80 years old hospitalized due to COVID-19, 790 (28.6%) had T2DM. Of these patients, 385 (48.7%) died during admission. On the multivariate analysis, the use of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (AOR 0.502, 95%CI 0.309-0.815, p=0.005) and angiotensin receptor blockers (AOR 0.454, 95%CI 0.274-0.759, p=0.003) were independent protectors against in-hospital mortality whereas the use of acetylsalicylic acid was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (AOR 1.761, 95%CI 1.092-2.842, p=0.020). Other antidiabetic drugs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins showed neutral association with in-hospital mortality. We found important differences between cardiometabolic drugs and in-hospital mortality in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus hospitalized for COVID-19. Preadmission treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers could reduce in-hospital mortality; other antidiabetic drugs, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins seem to have a neutral effect; and acetylsalicylic acid could be associated with excess mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Librarian 4 5%
Researcher 3 4%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 40 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 42 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#901,886
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#269
of 3,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,609
of 455,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences
#6
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,991 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.