You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Outcomes by sex following treatment initiation with darunavir/cobicistat in a large Spanish cohort of the CODAR study (GeSIDA 9316)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC), June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jac/dkz254 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M J Pérez Elías, B Alejos, M J Vivancos, E Ribera, M J Galindo, L Vilanova-Trillo, L J García-Fraile Fraile, S de La Fuente Moral, J Garcia De Lomas, F Lozano, M G Mateo García, M Tasias Pitarch, M Diez Martinez, J Rojas, M Raya-Cruz, M A Sepúlveda, J Troya, S Del Campo, E Martinez, Pilar Callau, Ana Moreno, Jose Luis Casado, Javier Martinez Sanchez, Cristina Gómez Ayerbe, Eugenia Negredo, Isabel Campos, Jordi Puig, Esteban Ribera, Ariadna Torrella, Bibiana Planas, Hernando Knobel, Clinico de Valencia, Ramon Ferrando, Manuel Crespo, Antonio Ocampo, José Sanz, Ignacio de los Santos, Alfonso Moreno, Alberto Díaz, Luz Martin Carbonero, Javier de la Torre, Mercedes Rivas Reina, Jesús Santos, Carmen María González Domenech, Mª Mar Gutierrez, Marta Montero, Sandra Cuéllar, Vicente Boix, Antonio Payeras, Pablo Ryan, Miguel Torralba, Fernando Cuadra, Esther Aznar, Herminia Esteban, Marta de Miguel, Patricia Gonzalez, María Yllescas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 20% |
| Librarian | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 47% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,186,994
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#1,659
of 8,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,001
of 367,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (JAC)
#41
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.