You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Metabolic Syndrome Features and Excess Weight Were Inversely Associated with Nut Consumption after 1-Year Follow-Up in the PREDIMED-Plus Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nutrition, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jn/nxaa289 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alicia Julibert, Maria del Mar Bibiloni, Laura Gallardo-Alfaro, Manuela Abbate, Miguel Á Martínez-González, Jordi Salas-Salvadó, Dolores Corella, Montse Fitó, J Alfredo Martínez, Ángel M Alonso-Gómez, Julia Wärnberg, Jesús Vioque, Dora Romaguera, José Lopez-Miranda, Ramon Estruch, Francisco J Tinahones, José Lapetra, Lluís Serra-Majem, Naomi Cano-Ibañez, Vicente Martín-Sánchez, Xavier Pintó, José J Gaforio, Pilar Matía-Martín, Josep Vidal, Clotilde Vázquez, Lidia Daimiel, Emilio Ros, Carmen Sayon-Orea, Nerea Becerra-Tomás, Ignacio M Gimenez-Alba, Olga Castañer, Itziar Abete, Lucas Tojal-Sierra, Jéssica Pérez-López, Leyre Notario-Barandiaran, Antoni Colom, Antonio Garcia-Rios, Sara Castro-Barquero, Rosa Bernal, José M Santos-Lozano, Cesar I Fernández-Lázaro, Pablo Hernández-Alonso, Carmen Saiz, Maria D Zomeño, Maria A Zulet, Maria C Belló-Mora, Javier Basterra-Gortari, Silvia Canudas, Albert Goday, Josep A Tur, PREDIMED-PLUS investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| Poland | 2 | 10% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Thailand | 1 | 5% |
| Belgium | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 5% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 152 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 80 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 86 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,122,899
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition
#956
of 9,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,287
of 519,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition
#11
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.