You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimated Substitution of Tea or Coffee for Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Was Associated with Lower Type 2 Diabetes Incidence in Case–Cohort Analysis across 8 European Countries in the EPIC-InterAct Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nutrition, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jn/nxz156 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fumiaki Imamura, Matthias B Schulze, Stephen J Sharp, Marcela Guevara, Dora Romaguera, Benedetta Bendinelli, Elena Salamanca-Fernández, Eva Ardanaz, Larraitz Arriola, Dagfinn Aune, Heiner Boeing, Courtney Dow, Guy Fagherazzi, Paul W Franks, Heinz Freisling, Paula Jakszyn, Rudolf Kaaks, Kay-Tee Khaw, Tilman Kühn, Francesca R Mancini, Giovanna Masala, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Peter M Nilsson, Kim Overvad, Valeria M Pala, Salvatore Panico, Aurora Perez-Cornago, Jose R Quirós, Fulvio Ricceri, Miguel Rodríguez-Barranco, Olov Rolandsson, Ivonne Sluijs, Magdalena Stepien, Annemieke M W Spijkerman, Anne Tjønneland, Tammy Y N Tong, Rosario Tumino, Linda E T Vissers, Heather A Ward, Claudia Langenberg, Elio Riboli, Nita G Forouhi, Nick J Wareham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 15% |
| Spain | 7 | 11% |
| Japan | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 34 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 71% |
| Scientists | 11 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 124 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Librarian | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 14% |
| Unknown | 50 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 57 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#944,345
of 25,822,778 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nutrition
#813
of 9,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,655
of 357,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nutrition
#13
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,822,778 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.