↓ Skip to main content

Longitudinal Relationship Between Knee Pain Status and Incident Frailty: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Overview of attention for article published in Pain Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Longitudinal Relationship Between Knee Pain Status and Incident Frailty: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
Published in
Pain Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.1093/pm/pnx296
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saad M Bindawas, Vishal Vennu, Brendon Stubbs

Abstract

Examine the longitudinal association between knee pain and prefrailty/frailty. Longitudinal study. Five clinical centers across the United States. Data from 3,053 nonfrail participants aged 45-79 years at baseline from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. According to self-reported knee pain at baseline, the participants were placed into three groups: no knee pain (N = 1,600), unilateral knee pain (N = 822), and bilateral knee pain (N = 631). Frailty status was assessed over time using the five frailty indicators (unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, weak energy, slow gait speed, and little physical activity). Based on the number of frailty indicators present, prefrailty (1-2) and frailty (≥3) were diagnosed. Generalized estimating equations logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the relationship between knee pain status and prefrailty/frailty. After adjusting for age, sex, race, education, marital status, smoking status, comorbidities, and body mass index, unilateral knee pain at baseline was associated with an increased odds of developing prefrailty (odds ratio [OR] = 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01-1.27) and frailty (OR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.38-2.62), and bilateral knee pain at baseline was also associated with an increased risk of prefrailty (OR = 1.41, 95% CI = 1.24-1.62) and frailty (OR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.63-3.01) over time in comparison with no knee pain. The interaction of knee pain status by time was not significantly associated with either prefrailty or frailty. Knee pain (particularly bilateral knee pain) is associated with an increased risk of developing prefrailty and frailty over time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 28 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 32 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#14,666,138
of 25,193,883 outputs
Outputs from Pain Medicine
#2,003
of 3,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,520
of 450,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain Medicine
#43
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,193,883 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.