You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Gender Bias in Collaborative Medical Decision Making: Emergent Evidence.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Academic medicine, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1097/acm.0000000000003590 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Erik G Helzer, Christopher G Myers, Christine Fahim, Kathleen M Sutcliffe, James H Abernathy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 36% |
| Canada | 15 | 34% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 9 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 61% |
| Scientists | 10 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 9% |
| Psychology | 3 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2021.
All research outputs
#1,347,392
of 25,501,527 outputs
Outputs from Academic medicine
#596
of 6,828 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,319
of 430,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic medicine
#16
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,501,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,828 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.