You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Bayesian Model to Predict COVID-19 Severity in Children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1097/inf.0000000000003204 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sara Domínguez-Rodríguez, Serena Villaverde, Francisco J. Sanz-Santaeufemia, Carlos Grasa, Antoni Soriano-Arandes, Jesús Saavedra-Lozano, Victoria Fumadó, Cristina Epalza, Miquel Serna-Pascual, José A. Alonso-Cadenas, Paula Rodríguez-Molino, Joan Pujol-Morro, David Aguilera-Alonso, Silvia Simó, Sara Villanueva-Medina, M. Isabel Iglesias-Bouzas, M. José Mellado, Blanca Herrero, Susana Melendo, Mercedes De la Torre, Teresa Del Rosal, Pere Soler-Palacin, Cristina Calvo, María Urretavizcaya-Martínez, Marta Pareja, Fátima Ara-Montojo, Yolanda Ruiz del Prado, Nerea Gallego, Marta Illán Ramos, Elena Cobos, Alfredo Tagarro, Cinta Moraleda, on behalf of EPICO-AEP Working Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 17 | 39% |
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 5% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 18% |
| Scientists | 3 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 24% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 26 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,150,144
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
#200
of 6,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,340
of 447,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
#7
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,302 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.