↓ Skip to main content

Interplay of activation kinetics and the derivative conductance determines resonance properties of neurons

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interplay of activation kinetics and the derivative conductance determines resonance properties of neurons
Published in
Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, April 2018
DOI 10.1103/physreve.97.042408
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodrigo F. O. Pena, Cesar C. Ceballos, Vinicius Lima, Antonio C. Roque

Abstract

In a neuron with hyperpolarization activated current (I_{h}), the correct input frequency leads to an enhancement of the output response. This behavior is known as resonance and is well described by the neuronal impedance. In a simple neuron model we derive equations for the neuron's resonance and we link its frequency and existence with the biophysical properties of I_{h}. For a small voltage change, the component of the ratio of current change to voltage change (dI/dV) due to the voltage-dependent conductance change (dg/dV) is known as derivative conductance (G_{h}^{Der}). We show that both G_{h}^{Der} and the current activation kinetics (characterized by the activation time constant τ_{h}) are mainly responsible for controlling the frequency and existence of resonance. The increment of both factors (G_{h}^{Der} and τ_{h}) greatly contributes to the appearance of resonance. We also demonstrate that resonance is voltage dependent due to the voltage dependence of G_{h}^{Der}. Our results have important implications and can be used to predict and explain resonance properties of neurons with the I_{h} current.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 1 14%
Physics and Astronomy 1 14%
Neuroscience 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2017.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
#8,096
of 20,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,411
of 343,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics
#137
of 369 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,990 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 369 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.