↓ Skip to main content

Plant Peroxisomes: Biogenesis and Function

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Cell, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
366 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
379 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plant Peroxisomes: Biogenesis and Function
Published in
Plant Cell, June 2012
DOI 10.1105/tpc.112.096586
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianping Hu, Alison Baker, Bonnie Bartel, Nicole Linka, Robert T. Mullen, Sigrun Reumann, Bethany K. Zolman

Abstract

Peroxisomes are eukaryotic organelles that are highly dynamic both in morphology and metabolism. Plant peroxisomes are involved in numerous processes, including primary and secondary metabolism, development, and responses to abiotic and biotic stresses. Considerable progress has been made in the identification of factors involved in peroxisomal biogenesis, revealing mechanisms that are both shared with and diverged from non-plant systems. Furthermore, recent advances have begun to reveal an unexpectedly large plant peroxisomal proteome and have increased our understanding of metabolic pathways in peroxisomes. Coordination of the biosynthesis, import, biochemical activity, and degradation of peroxisomal proteins allows for highly dynamic responses of peroxisomal metabolism to meet the needs of a plant. Knowledge gained from plant peroxisomal research will be instrumental to fully understanding the organelle's dynamic behavior and defining peroxisomal metabolic networks, thus allowing the development of molecular strategies for rational engineering of plant metabolism, biomass production, stress tolerance, and pathogen defense.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 379 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 1%
Brazil 3 <1%
India 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 366 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 20%
Researcher 63 17%
Student > Bachelor 61 16%
Student > Master 41 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 4%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 79 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 185 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 81 21%
Environmental Science 7 2%
Chemistry 3 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 <1%
Other 13 3%
Unknown 88 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2013.
All research outputs
#8,493,143
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from Plant Cell
#4,057
of 7,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,465
of 181,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Cell
#32
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.